Very Good Debates

John W. Lucas, Moderator
Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP; San Francisco
Judicial Debate
Resolved: Structured dismissals of chapter 11 cases must always follow the Bankruptcy Code's priority structure.
Pro: Hon. August B. Landis
U.S. Bankruptcy Court (D. Nev.); Las Vegas
Con: Hon. Deborah L. Thorne
U.S. Bankruptcy Court (N.D. Ill.); Chicago
Business Debate
Resolved, a company deriving income indirectly from marijuana sales that are legal under state law should be eligible for relief under the Bankruptcy Code.
Pro: Daniel J. Garfield
McAllister Law Office P.C.; Denver
Con: Candace C. Carlyon
Morris Polich & Purdy LLP; Henderson, Nev.
Consumer Debate
Resolved: The filing of a Proof of Claim, for a debt on which the statute of limitations has run, is a violation of the FDCPA.
Pro: Stephen E. Berken
Berken and Associates; Denver
Con: Alane A. Becket
Becket & Lee, LLP; Malvern, Pa.

Price: $25.00
SKU: 162610
75 mins

ABI encourages participants to ask questions during sessions both live and on demand. If you have a question for a panelist during a session you should email the panelist your question and the panelist will respond to you promptly. Most panelists are ABI members, so you can access the panelist's email address in ABI's membership directory, or alternatively you can go to and ask your question there.